From wiki.gis.com
Jump to: navigation, search

Dissolve is an application of the conceptual operators that aggregates features often referred to as 'Merge' or 'Amalgamation.' It is a process in which a new map feature is created by merging adjacent polygons, lines, or regions that have a common value for a specified attribute. In GIS, dissolve is one of the Data Management tools used for generalizing features. In choropleth maps, the dissolve operation eliminates the boundaries of enumeration units with a common value, depicting a much larger area holding the same common value. Thus, using the dissolve operator on multiple polygons with a common value will yield one new polygon, combining the dimensions of the original, dissolved polygons. Giving linear features a dotted appearance or connecting linked line segments into one larger line segment in a GIS is also considered a dissolve operation.[1]

Dissolve has various applications in cartography and GIS. For example, road or river datasets often present the same linear feature in a number of segments. This can create problems for analysis or display, but dissolve can be used to combine them together and facilitate their intended use. Polygons are also commonly dissolved. For example, a cartographer or GIS user may desire to show several distinct polygon areas as one contiguous area, such as combining certain areas into one large region (for instance, merging east and west Germany into Germany). [2] Other uses include combining separate counties in a state to emphasize a common variable, or combining multiple countries into their respective continents. The dissolve operation is useful for performing these and many other tasks which a cartographer or GIS user may encounter.

About the Merge/Amalgamation Operator

"The merge operator combines an array of related features into a single representative feature without a change in dimension”[3] and has also been referred to as amalgamation [4], dissolving[5], agglomeration[4], dissolution[6], and fusion.[7][3] Some authors have used the term merge to refer to the combination of lines and the term amalgamation to refer to the combination of polygons[3][8][9][6][10][11][12][13], although this operation can be performed on points as well.[3] It should be noted that Merge is different than the Aggregate feature because no change in dimensionality (i.e. point to polygon) occurs. [3][14][6]

Dissolving Attribute Data

As the dissolve process does not retain all of the underlying attribute data of the original undissolved features in the new dissolve layer, it is important to understand how the dissolve operation affects data and how to achieve desired results. It is the removing of boundaries between adjacent polygons having the same value for a specific attribute, combining polygons that would otherwise be assigned the same color or hatch pattern in a thematic map display.

Three polygons before the dissolve operation.
A single polygon after the dissolve operation.
Nevada counties, symbolized red or blue based on the attribute value for 'Blue'.
Dissolving on the color attribute results in fewer polygons, which are contiguous when possible.
In this example, the original attribute table contains several columns of data, one of which is 'Blue'. Using this data, each county has a value of either 1 or 0 (blue or red), and this is the criteria by which they are symbolized in the map examples, and also by which the dissolve is run. Note that there are other fields of data for counties in this table.

After the dissolve, however, the data is quite different. In the lower table, the attribute table for the dissolved features shows new statistics for the Shape Area and Shape Length, and another column of data is added called Export_Output_Blue.

The Export_Output_Blue column is an updated version of the original 'Blue' column from the undissolved map. Note that all other data that was not part of the dissolve process was removed.

Also note that not all of the blue areas resolved to a single polygon, yet all of the data (Shape_Area and Shape_Length) for each Blue value is summed as a single entry in the data table. Attributes of features that become aggregated by dissolve can be summarized or described using a variety of statistics. The statistic used to summarize attributes is added to the output feature class as a single field with the following naming standard of statistic type + underscore + input field name. For example, if the SUM statistic is used on a field named 'POP', the output will have a field named 'SUM_POP'. To find out more about the syntax and process used in ArcGIS to summarize aggregated data on dissolve, see ESRI Web Help - Dissolve (Data Management).

Usage Tips

  • The attributes of the aggregated features may be summarized using a statistic type. For example, when aggregating sale territories, the revenue for each feature within a territory could be summed to obtain the total sales revenue for that territory (revenue sum).
  • The statistic type used to summarize attributes is added to the output feature class as a single field: statistic_field.
  • Text attribute fields may be summarized using the statistics First or Last. Numeric attribute fields may be summarized using any statistic: Sum, Mean, Max, Min, Range, Std, First, or Last.
  • Multipart option gives users control over the existence of multipart features in the output feature class. When MULTI_PART is used in the command line or this option is checked on the dialog, multipart features are allowed in the output feature class; otherwise, the output will contain single_part features only.
  • Dissolve can create very large multipart polygon features. This is especially true when using a small number of Dissolve Field(s) or when dissolving all features into a single feature. Very large features may cause display problems and/or have poor performance when drawn on a map or when edited. To avoid these potential problems, use the multipart parameter's MULTI_PART option to split potentially larger multipart features into many smaller features.
  • The spatial reference of the output feature class will be the same as the input features.
  • The Dissolve Field(s) parameter's Add Field button is used only in ModelBuilder. In ModelBuilder, where the preceding tool has not been run, or its derived data does not exist, the Dissolve Field(s) parameter may not be populated with field names. The Add Field button allows you to add expected fields so you can complete the Dissolve dialog and continue to build your model.
  • Current map layers may be used to define input features. When using layers, only the currently selected features are used in the Dissolve operation.
  • Dissolve limits the creation of extremely large features based on the relation of feature size to available memory. In such cases, smaller more manageable features will be created. Warning messages will be used to indicate this occurrence.

More Resources

  • Dissolve. Retrieved October 1, 2017, from http://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/tool-reference/data-management/dissolve.htm
  • 7 Geoprocessing Tools Every GIS Analysist Should Know. Retrieved October 1, 2017 from http://gisgeography.com/geoprocessing-tools/
  • 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 Roth, Robert E.; Stryker, Michael; & Brewer, Cynthia A. (n.d.) “The Scale Master Typology: Literature Foundation” [PDF] Associated with The Scale Master Project, a collaboration between PennStateUniversity, the University of Colorado, Michigan State University, and Esri. <http://www.personal.psu.edu/cab38/ScaleMaster/ScaleMaster_Typology_Literature_Review_booklet_Roth_final.pdf>
  • 4.0 4.1 DeLucia, AA, and RT Black. 1987. Comprehensive approach to automatic feature generalization. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Cartographic Conference. Morelia, Mexico: 12-21 October.
  • Tomlinson, RF, and AR Boyle. 1981. The State Of Development of Systems for Handling Natural Resources Inventory Data.
  • 6.0 6.1 6.2 Monmonier, M. 1996. How to Lie with Maps. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Foerster, T, J Stoter, and B Köbben. 2007. Towards a Formal Classification of Generalization Operators. In: Proceedings of the 23th International Cartographic Conference. Moscow, Russia: 3-10 August. Cartographica 18(4): 65-95.
  • McMaster, Robert B. and Mark Monmonier. (1988). A Conceptual Framework for Quantitative and Qualitative Raster-Mode Generalization. In: Proceedings, GIS/LIS'89, Orlando, Florida. Falls Church, VA: American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.
  • McMaster, RB. 1989. The integration of simplification and smoothing routines in line generalization. Cartographica 26(1): 101- 121.
  • McMaster, RB, and KS Shea. 1992. Generalization in Digital Cartography. Washington, DC: Association of American Geographers Press.
  • Yaolin, L, M Molenaar, and AD Tinghua. 2001. Frameworks for Generalization Constraints and Operations Based on Object- Oriented Data Structures in Database Generalization. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Cartographic Conference. Beijing, China: 6-10 August.
  • Slocum, TA, RB McMaster, FC Kessler, and HH Howard. 2005. Thematic Cartography and Geographic Visualization. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • Regnauld, N, and RB McMaster. 2007. A Synoptic View of Generalisation Operators. In: WA Mackaness, A Ruas, and LT Sarjakowski (eds) Generalisation of Geographic Information: Cartographic Modelling and Applications. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
  • Lee, D. 1996. Automation of Map Generalization: The Cutting-Edge Technology. ESRI White Paper Series. Redlands, CA: ESRI.